Feed aggregator

The energy regulator wants to fast-track viable projects and deter speculative projects that request grid connectivity

As organizations move beyond AI experimentation, success will depend on how effectively they combine intelligence and trust. The same systems that amplify knowledge, accelerate decisions, and unlock new outcomes must also protect data, govern AI, and build resilience. In this next phase of transformation, security is not separate from innovation—it is an enabler that helps make responsible innovation possible at a faster pace. That starts with asking better questions—the kind that help organizations turn intelligence into action and trust into a foundation for progress. 

AI is changing how security decisions are made. Defenders now have access to more signals, insights, and analytical power than ever before. But better security does not start with more information. It starts with asking the right questions: What are we trying to protect? What risks matter most? What conditions need to be true? And what decisions do we need to make with confidence? 

That clarity matters because security is shaped by more than technology. The challenges organizations face rarely exist in isolation. They emerge across people, processes, technology, data, identities, and governance. Understanding those connections is what allows security teams to use platforms, AI, and automation to make better decisions under real-world conditions. 

Connect with Microsoft Security at Black Hat USA 2026 Security as a systems challenge 

Security has never been a single-layer challenge. Vulnerabilities can emerge across code, data, identities, and integrations, while exposure is often created at the intersections between them. Designing for security requires a systems mindset—understanding how these elements work together, where failure can occur, and what safeguards are needed so no single layer carries the burden alone. That is why defense in depth remains essential: layered controls, ongoing monitoring, mitigations, and risk management across the AI lifecycle help organizations reduce exposure while continuing to adapt. 

This is especially important as AI becomes more embedded in how organizations operate. AI can help teams analyze vast amounts of information, identify patterns, and surface recommendations at a scale that was previously unthinkable. Those AI outputs still require oversight, governance, and human judgment, with clear accountability for how AI-generated insights are validated and used. But insight only creates value when it is grounded in the right context and connected to action. 

AI-generated insights still require validation, oversight, and resilience planning because AI systems can produce incomplete or inaccurate outputs.

Clarity creates better decisions 

The most important security decisions start with a clear view of the risk, the level of control or visibility required, and the outcome the system is designed to achieve. When we optimize for capability over context, we miss how security decisions are actually made: through signals, expertise, validation, and judgment. This becomes even more important as AI expands what is possible. Better analysis can surface more insights, but better decisions still depend on understanding what matters most and applying the right context. That matters most when conditions are changing quickly, and teams need to act before every answer is certain. 

Threat intelligence offers a useful example. Defenders operate in environments defined by ambiguity, incomplete information, and rapidly changing conditions. Success rarely comes from a single source or signal. It comes from combining multiple forms of intelligence, applying expertise, validating assumptions, and connecting insights in ways that strengthen assurance.  

The lesson extends beyond threat intelligence. Different security objectives require different combinations of signals, analysis, and human judgment. Resilient decisions come from bringing those elements together thoughtfully, rather than relying on a single source of truth or assuming technology alone can provide the answer. 

Designing for better outcomes  

As AI becomes more embedded in security operations, the quality of our outcomes depends on how clearly we define the objectives we are trying to achieve. Security leaders create the most value when they identify the risks that matter most, the conditions that need to be true, and the systems required to support better decisions. 

Then we design for those outcomes through the right mix of controls, safeguards, and decision-making processes. This shows up not just in architecture, but in how teams establish guardrails, validate assumptions, and respond to the unexpected. The aim is not to make security harder for defenders. It is to make the work easier to execute, supported by platforms, tooling, and AI that help deliver greater speed, accuracy, and confidence. 

The systems we are building today do not exist in isolation. They interact with people, shape decisions, and operate at a scale that can amplify both strengths and weaknesses. Our responsibility extends beyond technology choices. We have to help organizations design systems they can understand, govern, and rely on with confidence as complexity grows. 

Trust is not something we can take for granted, and that does not change in the era of AI. It is built through deliberate choices: the controls we establish, the visibility we create, the assumptions we validate, and the safeguards we put in place. As AI becomes more embedded in how organizations operate, security leaders have a responsibility to help build confidence in the systems people rely on every day. 

Building trustworthy AI systems requires governance, security, privacy protections, transparency, and accountability across the full technology stack, aligned to responsible AI principles and standards.

The risk is not simply that we choose the wrong tool, model, or platform. The greater risk is believing that one answer can solve a complex, evolving problem. AI can help teams make sense of complexity, but it does not eliminate the need for judgment. If anything, it raises the importance of defining the right outcomes and designing systems that make the right actions easier to take. 

Better security starts with better questions, and with the clarity to act on them. The organizations that succeed will apply AI thoughtfully, define outcomes clearly, and combine analytical power with the expertise, judgment, and adaptability needed to build more resilient systems in the age of AI. 

Explore Microsoft Security solutions

To learn more about Microsoft Security solutions, visit our website. Bookmark the Security blog to keep up with our expert coverage on security matters. Also, follow us on LinkedIn (Microsoft Security) and X (@MSFTSecurity) for the latest news and updates on cybersecurity.

The post ​​Better security starts with better questions appeared first on Microsoft Security Blog.

I'm a director/exec, not a software engineer. Background's mostly data analytics, SQL and Excel day to day, some R and PostgreSQL. Years ago I could hack together basic HTML/CSS/PHP too.

Got into AI early and now use ChatGPT and Claude constantly. With their help I've built a handful of web apps, some Python scripts and desktop tools, and an Android app on Supabase with real multiple users.

So I can build things. But I'm very aware there are big holes underneath it. I can usually get something working without really knowing why it works, whether it's actually well built, or what's going to break down the road once it gets more complex.

Feels like it's time to go back to fundamentals. Michael Jordan still worked on his footwork, that kind of thing.

What I'm hoping to get to eventually:

* build small useful apps, windows/mac/android/ios/web

* automate chunks of my own and my team's work

* maybe build a simple SaaS at some point

* generally not get left behind, open to this reshaping my career or spinning into a side thing

Was hoping for something structured, starting from prompt/context engineering and working into real programming fundamentals, APIs, databases, architecture, security, testing, deployment. Problem is anything I find is stale within months given how fast this moves.

Not looking for free necessarily, and definitely not looking for "learn to code in a weekend." Willing to put in real time.

For people who've gone down this road already: what's actually worth learning properly, what's fine to just learn enough to supervise, and what can honestly just stay AI's job?

P.S.: Yes I polished/refined this post using AI, but I first wrote it all myself (the original was twice as long).

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49098829

Points: 1

# Comments: 0

Article URL: https://www.argmin.net/p/open-and-shut

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49098826

Points: 1

# Comments: 0

Article URL: https://web-ai-sdk.dev/playground/

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49098813

Points: 1

# Comments: 1

Article URL: https://lapcatsoftware.com/articles/2026/7/14.html

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49098803

Points: 2

# Comments: 0

Article URL: https://www.wsj.com/logistics-report/doordash-takes-to-the-sky-with-its-own-drones-0cc8658d

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49098801

Points: 1

# Comments: 0

Article URL: https://darthmall.net/2026/everywhere-foist-upon-us/

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49098797

Points: 2

# Comments: 0

Hey HN,

I'm Oli, Software engineer building Zaatar to to automate the organic growth on my different side projects.

The AI orchestrator I've built feels kind of magic tbh,

I hope some of you guys will find it useful!

Cheers

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49098777

Points: 2

# Comments: 0

I sought advice from four mainstream A.Is for a basic consumer use case question and to me, the differing style of the answers are quite revealing.

Premise: A poorly hung clothes dryer spectacularly ripped from the wall whilst on and tumbling, smashing into the washing machine beneath and trying to exit out the laundry door in a manner reminiscent of Stephen King's haunted laundromat story The Mangler.

After all the shards of glass, wall plaster etc were cleared up, the six month old washing machine wasn't working - yes, unsurprisingly but the problem was electronic, not mechanical. The display defaulted to blanks flashing - no error code etc. Having tried all the obvious fixes, I put the dilemma to four A.I.s: Chat GPT, Perplexity, Claude (Pro) and Google Search with A.I. Mode.

All suggested more or less the same checkpoints and then a technician but diverged into unique personae + ideas.

Chat GPT: Empathetic, sycophanticaly validating "you've taken a laundry mishap and turned it into a quantum learning exercise...Here is a well-worded, no nonsense description of the problem to show to your technican or Westinghouse...You should be proud though..."

Perplexity: Scolding like the worst school teacher - essentially, "the machine is damaged because of a situation of your making. Even if it is within warranty blah blah" Have you consulted the washing machine manual? I can help you find it. (Yes I'd consulted the manual and no I had not asked Perplexity about trying to get it repaired within warranty)

Google A.I. Mode: Moved briskly onto 'new washing machine' turf. eg "What did you like most about your Westinghouse? Would you like another front loader or given your traumatic experience with the clothes dryer, would you prefer an all in one washing machine and dryer? Affiliate links galore.

Claude: It is definitely a problem with the electronics - eg: a connector ribbon failure, cracked solder joint etc etc - if you're comfortable and have the serial number, I can provide teardown instructions etc etc

I was actually into this idea and liked that Claude would have gone with me on it but as I was also on deadline, with piles of stinky laundry lurking, I ended up using H.I. - Human Intution.

Intuitively - and wasn't in the washing machine manual - I pressed the on/off button for a long hold and the machine revived - No teardown, no new machine, no eloquently composed briefs for Westinghouse nor shady attempt to get help from them either.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49098762

Points: 2

# Comments: 0

Article URL: https://onlyvibes.cc

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49098758

Points: 2

# Comments: 0

Article URL: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9d0l40v551o

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49098751

Points: 2

# Comments: 0

Article URL: https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/products/gemini-app/speak-naturally-gemini-app-mac-os/

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49098747

Points: 2

# Comments: 0

Article URL: https://blog.jetbrains.com/kotlin/2026/07/secure-your-apis-oauth2-and-jwt-for-beginners/

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49098735

Points: 2

# Comments: 0

Article URL: https://pilcrowonpaper.com/blog/18

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49098734

Points: 2

# Comments: 0

Article URL: https://www.reinvent.science/p/the-scientific-literature-is-poisonous

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49098728

Points: 5

# Comments: 0

Article URL: https://github.com/rails/rails/security/advisories/GHSA-xr9x-r78c-5hrm

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49098724

Points: 2

# Comments: 0

Article URL: https://twitter.com/lucaslovexoxo/status/2082098579632783441

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49098717

Points: 2

# Comments: 0

Article URL: https://karlbode.com/ai-doomsday-bullshit-is-getting-tired/

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49098716

Points: 3

# Comments: 0

Article URL: https://uss-la-ca135.org/60/1960Judkins-Knott.html

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49098705

Points: 2

# Comments: 0